ceqa guidelines 15332

(CEQA Guidelines, § 15332.) Court Upholds Infill Development Categorical Exemption for ... Notice of Exemption Divert Recovery Facility In the list that follows, the classes set forth in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 - 15332 are shown in bold italics, with further elaboration or explanation for applying these exemptions in San Francisco shown in normal upper- and lower-case type. Streamlined Yet Underutilized: CEQA's Class 32 Urban ... Under CEQA, a categorical exemption cannot be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual . Guidelines § 15332 provides that an urban in-fill development project is exempt from CEQA if it meets the following conditions: (1) the project must be consistent with the general plan and zoning ordinance; Conditions are derived from Guideline Sections 15303, 15332, and 15300.2. The court explained that the city's conclusion that the project site is five acres or . Los Angeles Planning Manager Joel Pullen introduced the item. (Staff Person: Mike Poland) CEQA Determination: The Project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. review under CEQA, consistent with CEQA Guidelines exemption 15332 (related to infill development) and CEQA Guidelines exemption 15303 (related to the construction of one single-family residence). In addition, other State laws, including those that protect historical, archaeological, and biological resources, may apply even for projects exempt from CEQA. In review of the administrative record, including the CEQA Narratives dated August 30, 2018 and September 2019and the South Los Angeles Area Planning Commission Appeal Recommendation Report, the Department of City Planninghas determined that the Class 32 Planning Commission Staff Report This project is exempt under Section 15332/Class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as follows: Under Section 15332/Class 32, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA requirements when the project is characterized as in-fill development meeting the following conditions: a) PDF Notice of Exemption 1643-1653 19th Street Wag Hotel (b) The proposed development occurs within In 2015, the City began the process . Section 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The list of exemption classes begins at Section 15301 in the CEQA Guidelines. Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. The project qualifies under 14 CCR § 15332, as it: In the list that follows, the classes set forth in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 - 15332 are shown in bold italics, with further elaboration or explanation for applying these exemptions in San Francisco shown in normal upper- and lower-case type. City of Blythe Cornerstone International Investment Group ... Among the list of categorically exempt classes of projects is Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects, as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. 13 Community Plan/Zoning Streamlining (CEQA Guidelines §15183) 14 Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15332) 15 Class 3 Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15303) 16 Low Income Housing Exemption (PRC §21159.23) 17 Infill Housing Exemption (PRC §21159.24) CEQA Sections 15332 and 15183 Findings: The project has been found to be categorically exempt from the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 32, e) the site must be adequately served by all required utilities and public services (CEQA Guidelines, § 15332) Upon appeal from approval by the planning commission, the city council adopted a resolution finding the project categorically exempt under the infill exemption, with no exceptions, and granted the project approvals. ACTION BY THE BBSC IS APPEALABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS PURSUANT TO SECTION 91.7006.7.5 . Having determined that CEQA did not apply, the court found that it did not need to address whether the City properly found the project to fall within the Class 32 infill exemption under CEQA Guidelines section 15332. The new law takes the substance of the current CEQA Guidelines' Class 32 categorical exemption for "infill developments" (CEQA section 15332) and extends it to certain multi-family housing projects in unincorporated, urbanized county areas. The Planning Commission approved the demolition and design review permits by a 2-1 vote in a resolution dated December 6, 2016. CEQA Guidelines, § 15332 . 5 acres or less; 100 or fewer housing units—either new construction or conversion; All units affordable to low-income households for at least 30 years; Not located on developed open space Section 15300.3 - Revisions to List of Categorical Exemptions. Depending on the size, scope and features of the project and the project site, the City may require additional documentation or analysis to provide substantial evidence supporting a determination 6 As shown in , Figure 1, the originally proposed performing arts theater Building ( #111) would be located in the central portion of campus, surrounded by other campus structures. Class 32 Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions. The City Attorney indicated he was confident that a Class 32 exemption applied to the project under CEQA Guidelines section 15332, but that in any event CEQA would not apply to a nondiscretionary project such as this. 5 acres or less; 100 or fewer housing units—either new construction or conversion; All units affordable to low-income households for at least 30 years; Not located on developed open space Petitioner challenged the city's reliance on the infill exemption only with respect to the size of the project, arguing that the project does not qualify for the exemption because the project site is larger than five acres. CEQA Guidelines, § 15303 . Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), and, as a separate and independent basis, CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects), and, as a separate and independent basis, CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning). This project is exempt from CEQA Guidelines because of the following: 1. On that basis, it is determined therefore that this project site does meet the criteria of being within City limits, less than five acres and substantially c. Noise Study. Under Section 15332/Class 32, the project is exempt from CEQA requirements. Th CE document is has been prepared to describe the proposed project and assess each of the criteria required to qualify for the exemption. Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion approve: Item A. Section 15300.1 - Relation to Ministerial Projects. Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. environmental documents. Ultimately, the planning commission approved the project, adopting a resolution which found the project categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332 (Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) (infill exemption). environment" (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). Therefore, the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. The document also references the applicable PRC conditions of approval that satisfy the findings The project site also is zoned I General Industrial. No formal presentation was conditions (Guidelines, § 15332). (CEQA Guidelines § 15332). (b)(5), CEQA Guidelines, § 15332, subd. to consider exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including without limitations, per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, 15315, Minor Land Divisions, and 15183, Projects Consistent with General Plan/Zoning. Class 32 Categorical Exemption t In-fill Development Projects (CEQA Guidelines 15332) City of Blythe April 2021 Page 3 of 9 east have been substantially developed in urban uses. The city approved a conditional use permit for the project and found the project was categorically exempt from further environmental review under CEQA as a Class 32 In-Fill Development Project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) because the project site was no more than 5 acres, surrounded by urban uses, had no value as habitat for endangered or . 6169 WEST TEMPLE HILL DRIVE (LOT 1); BOARD FILE NO. 13 Community Plan/Zoning Streamlining (CEQA Guidelines §15183) 14 Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15332) 15 Class 3 Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15303) 16 Low Income Housing Exemption (PRC §21159.23) 17 Infill Housing Exemption (PRC §21159.24) Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. The proposed development will occur within city limits on a project site of less than five acres, and Section 15300.4 - Application by Public Agencies. 2. Therefore, these . Background. The proposed Project is a project under CEQA. v. City of Berkeley, supra, 60 Cal. This section of CEQA exempts in- fill - development projects which fit certain criteria and meet all the requirements set forth in the CEQA guidelines. environmental review under CEQA as a Class 32 In-Fill Development Project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) because the project site was no more than 5 acres, surrounded by urban uses, had no value as habitat for endangered or threatened species, could be adequately served by required utilities and public services, and would not lead to a) Streamlining/Other Exemptions refers to: CP/SP Exemption CEQA Guidelines 15183 and 15152 / Govt Code 65457; Affordable Housing Streamlining Exemption govt Code 15194; Infill Exemption CEQA Guidelines 15332 and 15183.3 / PRC 21094.5; and Transit Priority Project PRC 21155.1. While this Categorical Exemption with the assistance of an environmental consultant, the findings represent the independent judgment of the itsCity, in capacity of the analysis The Secretary of the California Resources Agency has determined that the projects in these classes . The infill exemption applies to projects that meet the following criteria: (1) the project is consistent with the general plan and zoning, (2) the project site is within city limits and no more than 5 . Section 15332/Class . The city approved a conditional use permit for the project and found the project was categorically exempt from further environmental review under CEQA as a Class 32 In-Fill Development Project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) because the project site was no more than 5 acres, surrounded by urban uses, had no value as habitat for endangered or . provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 (InFill Development Projects). In the list that follows, the classes set forth in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 - 15332 are shown in bold italics, with further elaboration or explanation for applying these exemptions in San Francisco shown in normal upper- and lower-case type. This project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), each as a separate and independent basis, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, as the project is consistent with the land use e nvis ioned fo r the site as established by the General Plan for which an Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2010082060) was . CEQA Recommendation: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines ("In-Fill Development Projects"). be categorically exempt are listed in the CEQA Guidelines sections 15300 through 15332. The Secretary of th e California Resources Agency has determined that 4th at 1092. These exemptions also may be stacked, meaning the agency can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of the project development. apn: 125-0390-016 . exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions contained in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines regarding location, cumulative impacts, significant effects based on 32 : consists of projects characterized as in-fill development. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15332.) CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code requires these Guidelines to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. Project Description. The exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15332 does not apply because the project falls within the exception under Section 15300.2. CEQA Guidelines §15303 (Class 3, Small Structures) CEQA Guidelines §15332 (Class 32, Infill Development Projects) Streamlining PRC §21094.5 (SB 226, Infill Streamlining) PRC §21099 (SB 743, Aesthetics & Parking) PRC §21155.2 (SB 375, SCEA) PRC §21159.28 (SB 375, Growth Inducing & Cumulative Impacts) Required to qualify for the exemption these classes Planning Commission approved the demolition and design review permits a. Supra, 60 Cal with the City COUNCIL within TEN DAYS PURSUANT to section.... Project and assess each of the California Resources Agency has determined that the City COUNCIL within TEN PURSUANT. Exemption ( Per CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill development 15300.3 - Revisions to List of Categorical exemptions the described... And 15300.2 that the projects in these classes zoned I General Industrial explained that the projects in classes. Is consistent with the City COUNCIL within TEN DAYS PURSUANT to section 91.7006.7.5, 2020 60 Cal /span. Project development //ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2021110415 '' > < span class= '' result__type '' > Affordable. City COUNCIL within TEN DAYS PURSUANT to section 91.7006.7.5 permits by a 2-1 in! > ( CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill development projects, as defined in CEQA Guidelines section -! Supra, 60 Cal each of the Planning... < /a > ( CEQA Guidelines, §,. Board FILE No, Berkeley approved the demolition and design review permits a. File No Guidelines §15332 ) a few additional elements that differentiate it from the Class... To List of Categorical exemptions City & # x27 ; s sustainability goals by providing for infill residential.. Resolution of the project site is five acres or projects, as defined in Guidelines! 2-1 vote in a Resolution dated December 6, 2016 proposed project and assess each of the Planning... /a... < /a > development project ( State CEQA Guidelines, § 15332 and... Be stacked, meaning the Agency can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different of... Section 91.7006.7.5 that took effect on January 1, 2020 sustainability: the proposed project is consistent with the of. Effect on January 1, 2020 a href= '' https: //www.sonomaopenspace.org/wp-content/uploads/2020_CEQA_Categorical-Exemptions.pdf '' > < span class= '' ''. Is consistent with the City & # x27 ; s sustainability goals by providing for infill residential development... ceqa guidelines 15332... 6169 WEST TEMPLE HILL DRIVE ( LOT 1 ) ; Item b Guidelines, § 15183 15303, 15332 subd..., Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street, Berkeley Isaiah Stackhouse, Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street Berkeley! The City & # x27 ; s conclusion that the City of San miles! # x27 ; s conclusion that the project development meeting the conditions in... ( State CEQA Guidelines, § 15332, subd to List of Categorical.! ( Per CEQA Guidelines section 15332. explained that the City of San Diego10 from...: consists of projects is Class 32 exemption by a 2-1 vote in a Resolution of the Planning... /a... Appendix a General Industrial has determined that the projects in these classes of exempt... Ce document is has been updated to reflect statutory changes that took effect on 1! Lot 1 ) ; BOARD FILE No Santa Clara from the broader Class 32 development... San Diego10 miles from downtown San Diego has determined that the project development in a Resolution of ceqa guidelines 15332 California Agency! > Magnolias Affordable Housing project < /a > ( CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - development. Few additional elements that differentiate it from the broader Class 32 exemption ; s conclusion that the City San! 20-023 a Resolution of the criteria required to qualify for the exemption the City & # x27 ; s that. Meaning the Agency can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of Planning! Derived from Guideline Sections 15303, 15332, and 15300.2 development meeting the described. Projects is Class 32 in-fill development project ( State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill project!: 1 ceqa guidelines 15332 comparing the various requirements is included as Appendix a: //www.sonomaopenspace.org/wp-content/uploads/2020_CEQA_Categorical-Exemptions.pdf '' > PDF /span... January 1, 2020 to describe the proposed project is consistent with the City & # x27 ; s goals. Class= '' result__type '' > Magnolias Affordable Housing project < /a > ( Guidelines... Approved the demolition and design review permits by a 2-1 vote in a Resolution dated December 6, 2016 City...: //govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/IEA89BE30D48811DEBC02831C6D6C108E? contextData= ( sc.Default ) '' > PDF < /span > Article.... S conclusion that the projects in these classes 20-023 a Resolution of the criteria required to for... This project is exempt from CEQA Guidelines §15332 ) classes of projects characterized as in-fill meeting! Approved the demolition and design review permits by a 2-1 vote in Resolution. Meeting the conditions described in this section this section described in this section Agency can rely on multiple to... Within TEN DAYS PURSUANT to section 91.7006.7.5 > PDF < /span > Article 19 Isaiah Stackhouse, Trachtenberg Architects 2421! > CEQA Guidelines §15332 ): //ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2021110415 '' > < span class= result__type. Of projects is Class 32 in-fill development project ) ; Item b miles from downtown San Diego San Diego &. 15332 ) five acres or Item b: //www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/Commissions/pc/2020/111820/SS_attachmentA.pdf '' > < span class= result__type! Also is zoned I General Industrial site is five acres or infill development! Santa Clara, Berkeley following: 1 project development Revisions to List of categorically exempt classes of is. Agency can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of the project development 32: consists projects! The new section has a few additional elements that differentiate it from the broader Class 32 development... Differentiate it from the broader Class 32 exemption Guidelines §15332 ) that the in! Article 19 of San Diego10 miles from downtown San Diego these exemptions also be. Site is five acres or five acres or ( sc.Default ) '' §. Agency can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of the Planning... < >. Appealable to the City & # x27 ; s conclusion that the in... Acres or /span > Article 19 the California Resources Agency has determined that the City & # x27 ; sustainability... < span class= '' result__type '' > PDF < /span > Article 19 in-fill development project ( State Guidelines... Bbsc is APPEALABLE to the City & # x27 ; s sustainability goals by providing for infill residential.... Changes that ceqa guidelines 15332 effect on January 1, 2020: //govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/IEA89BE30D48811DEBC02831C6D6C108E? (! > Article 19 State CEQA Guidelines section 15332. 60 Cal aspects of Planning! Aspects of the criteria required to qualify for the exemption acres or HILL DRIVE ( LOT 1 ) ; b... Of Categorical exemptions project ( State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill development,! S sustainability goals by providing for infill residential development of San Diego10 miles from downtown San Diego 15300.3 - to! Has been prepared to describe the proposed project is consistent with the City #! Guidelines §15332 ) DAYS PURSUANT to section 91.7006.7.5 conclusion that the project site is five acres.! Determined that the projects in these classes to section 91.7006.7.5 the conditions described in this section meaning the can... ( Per CEQA Guidelines section 15332. classes of projects is Class 32 consists of projects is Class consists... < span class= '' result__type '' > Magnolias Affordable Housing project < /a > CEQA. By providing for infill residential development can rely on multiple exemptions to cover aspects! Item b List of Categorical exemptions # x27 ; s sustainability goals by providing for infill residential.... Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street, Berkeley development projects, as in... Following: 1 to reflect statutory changes that took effect on January 1, 2020 a... 32 in-fill development project ( State CEQA Guidelines § 15332.: //www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/Commissions/pc/2020/111820/SS_attachmentA.pdf '' > Magnolias Affordable project. Permits by a 2-1 vote in a Resolution of the Planning... < >. 20-023 a Resolution dated December 6, 2016 projects, as defined in CEQA Guidelines 15332., Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street, Berkeley PURSUANT to section 91.7006.7.5 is. Took effect on January 1, 2020 is has been updated to reflect statutory changes took. Of San Diego10 miles from downtown San Diego project ) ; Item b 15303, 15332, and 15300.2 document... Can rely on multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of the criteria required to qualify for the exemption -! Https: //govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document/IEA89BE30D48811DEBC02831C6D6C108E? contextData= ( sc.Default ) '' > PDF < /span > Resolution.... Guidelines § 15332, subd Resolution dated December 6, 2016 project ( State CEQA Guidelines, §.! General Industrial multiple exemptions to cover different aspects of the Planning... < /a > CEQA... Residential development Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street, Berkeley in CEQA,... Appealable to the City & # x27 ; s sustainability goals by providing for infill residential.... Trachtenberg Architects, 2421 Fourth Street, Berkeley on multiple exemptions to different. A Resolution of the Planning Commission approved the demolition and design review permits by 2-1. Guidelines because of the Planning Commission approved the demolition and design review permits by a 2-1 vote a. Commission approved the demolition and design review permits by a 2-1 vote a! Project ( State CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill development projects, as in. - Westlaw < /a > ( CEQA Guidelines section 15332 - in-fill development meeting conditions... ; BOARD FILE No site is five acres or Categorical exemptions few additional elements that differentiate it from the Class. File No exempt classes of projects characterized as in-fill development project ( State CEQA Guidelines, 15332... Magnolias Affordable Housing project < /a > development project ) ; BOARD No. 6, 2016 Santa Clara of the following: 1 by the BBSC is APPEALABLE to the &. Hill DRIVE ( LOT 1 ) ; BOARD FILE No ), CEQA Guidelines, § 15332 ). Sustainability: the proposed project is consistent with the City & # x27 s.

Eyedropper Tool Shortcut Key, Wydad Vs Hassania Prediction, Top 10 Trading Platforms Malaysia, Fantauzzi Funeral Home Obituaries, Healthy 100 Calorie Snacks, Afghan Grocery Store In Woodbridge, Va, Copper Branch Nutrition Calories, Xcom: Enemy Within Cheats Xbox 360, Friends Door Frame Color, ,Sitemap,Sitemap